If you want to contact Peter at GSR do it via the website.
http://performancec2.co.uk/
He is known as CPH on there.
The Remap(Chip, although not actually a chip. Programmed by laptop via the port under the ashtray) could also possibly be done if you got enough cars together, 206's, 307's, C4, C2 etc just basically any PSA car can get the GSR kit (various kits, and a remap) if you find a fair few people willing to do them chances are they would possibly be up for coming out to Spain to do the mods for you. Flights from the UK are cheap so shouldn't be an issue in that regard. As long as it is worth their while coming. And people will definitely show. Put the idea to him see what he says. He has offered to go to other countries before so it is a possibility.
If you look around the British Peugeot and Citroen sites you will find many have GSR kits installed with lots of rolling road graphs to look over.
Can't remember who said the GSR kit was too long either. But suffice to say. It is much shorter than the standard intake system. And similar in length to the K&N typhoon with a few differences. Mostly the tube diameter alters during the length on the GSR kit to speed up the air as it comes through. (like when you push the end of a water hose together and it comes out faster) Similar principle.
On a separate note...
hachiroku_AE86 escribió:Hoy he llevado el coche al banco de potencia y ha dado 170 cv aprox., creo que esta bastante bien, teniendo en cuenta que los atmosfericos dan menos cv de los declarados y que havia 27º de temperatura de admision, creo que si hubiera hecho la prueba en invierno habria dado algo mas jeje.
What is with the wheel (Ruedas) figure...125PS!!! Over a 30% transmission loss!!!! Something is seriously wrong there. By my calculations based on the wheel PS figures you should only be around 150PS at the motor. Looks like they used 4th gear based on the speeds which is the closest to 1:1 so that is right. Just seriously surprised at the wheel HP figures.
Typically a good way of estimating flywheel HP or PS from wheel figures is to +10= ... /0.9
So, 125.1+10=135.1/0.9=150.1ps/148.2BHP versus your graph at 169.5ps
For my figures. 158.6+10/0.9=187.3hp x 1.01387 = 189.9PS
These are estimates. However, with your motor figures I would expect to see over 140ps at the wheels. I would perhaps get it tested on another rolling road and see what that produces as I would not trust those figures. As if your car is only producing 125ps at the wheels something is wrong with it.
I personally never go on motor figures always use the wheel figures. But the motor figures are good for bragging rights.
My graph below is my most recent one and based on wheel figures only. Can see that the torque figures are identical to the previous rolling road. 2 completely different rolling roads at opposite ends of England. However flywheel figures one said I made 191.2hp(193ps) the other said I made 198hp. (201ps). Flywheel figures are for boasting in the pub, I will be honest about that. I know it was warmish but it should not have made that much difference to the wheel figures though.
Please get it tested somewhere else and if it comes back with 125ps or close I would seriously suggest giving the car a thorough going over. Just be a shame if there is a problem hidden away sapping power you are not aware of. Applying similar losses to my wheel figures would result in me being over 215ps. You should be running at least 145ps at the wheels I would think.